

PRAXIS AND THEORY AND EMANCIPATION
No.
1121
BIENVENIDOS!!
WELCOME!! WILLKOMMEN!!

*** Niños están naciendo con malformaciones en Colombia, a raíz de las fumigaciones con glifosato:
¡¡¡ Los nazis hitlerianos, no
lo podrían a ver hecho mejor !!!
*** MIDNIGHT
REFLECTIONS ON FIDEL CASTRO AND GLOBAL ORWELLIAN IMPERIALISM
By
Franz J. T. Lee


Web Poll about
News and Information
concerning VenezuelaPara
razones
científicas, estamos analizando la calidad y la veracidad de la
información y las
noticias nacionales e internacionales sobre las realidades venezolanas.
Visitors,
please
co-operate and answer the questions.
Por
favor, colabora y contesta las preguntas.


Niños están naciendo con malformaciones en Colombia, a raíz de las fumigaciones con glifosato: http://www.elheraldo.com.co/revistas/regional/00-06-22/noti3.htm
¡¡¡ Los nazis hitlerianos, no lo podrían a ver hecho mejor !!!


Ayúdanos a
difundir este mensaje
![]()

El gobierno colombiano planea un atentado ecológico: Cambiar la ley, para privatizar y fumigar los parques nacionales. Colabora con tu firma digital en:
http://www.ecolombia.org/parques.htm
NO A LA PRIVATIZACIÓN Y
FUMIGACIÓN DE LOS PARQUES NACIONALES COLOMBIANOS
NO AL DESPOJO DE TERRITORIOS INDÍGENAS Y AFROAMERICANOS
Los parques nacionales son depósitos de vida, son el
patrimonio de nuestra biodiversidad y pertenecen a nuestro futuro, mas
que nuestro presente. estas áreas son intangibles, es decir son
bienes inembargables, imprescriptibles e inmodificables. Su uso solo es
permitido para la conservación, el goce de la naturaleza o la
investigación científica. No es solo romanticismo
ambiental: los parques nacionales protegen hoy el 70% de las fuentes de
agua que consumimos los colombianos.
El Sistema de Parques Nacionales (50 en total y 10 millones de
hectáreas) constituyen el banco genético de Colombia.
Privatizarlo o Bombardearlo con veneno sería mucho mas grave que
echarle candela a los archivos de la Biblioteca Nacional, al Archivo
General de la Nación o que botar al mar el Museo del Oro del
Banco de la Republica.
En cuanto a las fumigaciones, con glifosato (de la multinacional
Monsanto), los científicos han demostrado que este herbicida es
tóxico para humanos, peces, lombrices de tierra, bacterias,
hongos, micorrizas, anfibios e insectos. Además el glifosato
afecta directamente el ciclo del nigrogeno en el suelo. Aparte de la
defoliación de los bosques, la transformación de la
molécula de glifosato en N-nitroso-glifosato y otros compuestos
relacionados están directamente relacionados con aumento de
cáncer y mutaciones fetales en humanos. Fumigar los parques
nacionales desconocería tratados internacionales, que tienen
fuerza de ley interna y solo beneficiaría a la multinacional
Monsanto que es la única que se beneficia económicamente
con las fumigaciones.
Después de cinco años y tres billones de dólares
en herbicidas, no se ha reducido un centímetro el área de
producción de coca. Los herbicidas causan daños
genéticos que ocasionan Malformaciones Congénitas,
actualmente la primera causa de Mortalidad Infantil en Colombia. Algo
mas grave: Médicos de Barquisimeto (Venezuela) han denunciado el
segundo índice mas alto de América, después de
Santa Marta de Malformaciones Congénitas. Es posible que las
corrientes aéreas de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta lleven las
partículas toxicas a Venezuela. No solamente se esta causando
daños a los Colombianos si no también a sus vecinos.
Que pasaría si los cultivos de marihuana de California o Hawaii
fueran fumigados desde el aire con herbicidas?
¿Se imaginan si esos tres billones de dólares gastados en
herbicidas se hubieran utilizado en programas sociales,
agrícolas, de salud y educación, o simplemente en
sustitución rentable de cultivos ilicitos?
Los parques nacionales no están deshabitados. Muchos se
superponen a Reservas Indígenas que cultivan coca ancestral como
los Koguis, Arhuacos, Cofanes, y….Esas reservas también serian
envenenadas, pese a los acuerdos entre el gobierno y las comunidades
indígenas. La unión de todos y la presión
política es la única esperanza de parar una
decisión criminal.
Además de este atentado ecológico, el gobierno colombiano
viene impulsando otras leyes totalmente nocivas para el medio ambiente
colombiano, como la ley de aguas, de paramos y el proyecto de Ley
Forestal que el Senado aprobó en segunda vuelta en diciembre y
que continua su trámite en la Cámara, este es uno de los
mayores retrocesos de la legislación y la protección
ambientales registrado en el país en las últimas
décadas. Además, es un despojo de los derechos
territoriales y culturales de los pueblos indígenas y de las
comunidades afroamericanas.
¿Hasta dónde quieren llegar quienes a nombre de una
supuesta seguridad pretenden despojarnos de las fuentes de agua y de
los mantos boscosos que las protegen; borrar las huellas de nuestros
abuelos quemando la tierra donde nacimos y crecimos; y desaparecer del
planeta las formas más complejas y ricas de la vida? No podemos
esperar a averiguarlo: Después no nos quedarían ni las
claves para descifrar un destino de desarraigo, aridez y vacío
cultural que nos quieren imponer.
¡No a las fumigaciones sobre los parques nacionales! ¡No a
la privatización de los Parques Nacionales. No a la
privatización del agua! No a la privatización de los
bosques, Territorios ancestrales y fuentes del saber y del ser de los
colombianos; hábitat de la diversidad del planeta!
Favor enviar sus cartas de apoyo con copias a las siguientes
direcciones:
Alvaro
Uribe Velez, Presidente de Colombia
presidencia@presidencia.gov.co
Sandra Suárez, ministra de Ambiente
dministro@minambiente.gov.co
- ssuarez@presidencia.gov.co
Ricardo Galan Jefe de comunicaciones de
Palacio
ricardogalan@presidencia.gov.co
Volmar Pérez Ortiz, Defensor del Pueblo
defensoria@defensoria.org.co
ONG evaluadora del Plan Colombia
plancolombia@aida-americas.org
Ecolombia.org
eco@ecolombia.org
George W. Bush, Presidente de EE.UU.
president@whitehouse.gov
Richard Cheney, Presidente del Congreso de EE.UU.
vice.president@whitehouse.gov
Presidencia Congreso de Colombia
presidencia@senado.gov.co,
Copia estas direcciones, y envía este mensaje como protesta al gobierno colombiano...
presidencia@senado.gov.co,
vice.president@whitehouse.gov,
president@whitehouse.gov,
eco@ecolombia.org, plancolombia@aida-americas.org,
defensoria@defensoria.org.co,
ricardogalan@presidencia.gov.co,
presidencia@presidencia.gov.co,
dministro@minambiente.gov.co,
ssuarez@presidencia.gov.co
| Latest | |
Published: Sunday, July 03, 2005
Bylined to: Franz J.T. Lee
Midnight reflections on Fidel Castro and Global Orwellian Imperialism
University of Los Andes (ULA) professor Franz
J. T. Lee writes: On
Friday night, July 1, between 10 and 12 a.m., I was listening to and
looking at a most informative live interview with President Fidel
Castro, directed by Walter Martinez in his 'Dossier' program of
Venezolana de Television (VTV).
Reflecting
deeply on all what Fidel
explained ... especially about the Orwellian future that faces the
"Third World" in general, and Latin America, Venezuela and the
Caribbean in particular ... unless we urgently unite, integrate and
defend ourselves in total revolutionary unison ... my mind began to run
wild, reaching trans-historic dimensions and future awesome realms.

In bed, I was still pondering about all of Fidel's profound reflections, explaining his rebelling youth, the development of the Cuban Revolution, also his high esteem and respect for President Hugo Chavez. He also confirmed that over 600 foreign CIA attempts were made on his life.
It's midnight. My candle flame is turning blue. Some evil sorcerer must have set loose all the evil spirits of the underworld, of Northern Transylvania. Hamlet warns us that there are more things in Heaven and on Earth than are dreamt of in our philosophy. He reminds us, that for homo sapiens sapiens, now, more than ever, the vital global question remains as: To be or not to be?
In my mind, God-Man, Man-God, appears on the historic scene. He has already exploited the horse's power, even the sacred cows are now running mad. Instead of using creative, free, clean Tesla energy, everywhere to be found in abundance, now profit hungry France, as Fidel explained, prefers to produce expensive mini-suns, solar energy, solar power in the laboratory. The world order really has a power problem, its energy is running out, it faces extinction.
In fact, delving much deeper into this contradictory global energetic issue, we observe that Chirac is treading on forbidden, dangerous soil; he is moving away from the divine, formal logical, mesocosmic curse of earthly toil, of digging for oil, of earning his daily bread by the sweat of his brow, by slave labor, by capitalist, imperialist, destructive production, and is now nearing the divinely reserved realm of micro- and macro-cosmic, galactic Creation, of fiat lux!
During the following decades ... as Fidel elaborated ... haunted by "Peak Oil," and faced by the coming scarcity or even absence of the black gold commodity itself, France will not be able to produce natural fossil energy anymore, on the contrary, scientifically, as reported, it will be forced to create a real baby sun on earth. Hence Chirac and his European successors, in spite of obvious Christian religious blasphemy, will become part of a new species Man the Divine Creator.
And why not, also another species could be born, Man the Self-Creative Emancipator, the Self-Emancipating Creator?
Many centuries ago, African, Arab and Jewish Aristotelian materialist philosophers, like Avicenna, Averroes and Avicebron, already spoke about this Self-Creative Nature and Self-Created Nature, about natura naturata and natura naturans.
How I wish to have discussed this particular transcendental, revolutionary issue with Fidel, who is an expert in global political economy, explaining to him that the Creation of Suns, Moons and Stars would imply an emancipatory exodus out of the heliocentric, dialectical, capitalist world and its exploiting, dominating ideology, towards other still unknown horizons, undiscovered worlds, new spheres of human being, existence and transcendence. Like Fidel remarked, with regard to the origins of the Cuban national liberation movement, that radicalized itself progressively, this is not "utopian" ivory-tower wishful thinking in a non-practical sense, but necessary teleological reflections about things already happening and existing on our planet earth.
However, returning to more day to day earthly realities, to Venezuela, already since decades, Joan Baez desperately has asked: Where have all the flowers, all the trees gone? Soon the Middle East, the Balkans, Asia, Africa and Latin America will sing: Where have all our black gold, our gas, our water, our oxygen, our biodiversity, our Congo Basin, our Orinoco Delta, our Amazonia gone?
Yes, like Amazonia, like our biodiversity, our strategic, invaluable natural resources, because of the new global, fascist conquest, because of the onslaught of the mighty international corporations, all our natural wealth is evaporating into metropolitan, capitalist, imperialist, corporate "private property of humanity"! Soon we will know who all along history exclusively, form part, belonged and still belong to the sonorous concept "Humanity".
Here in Merida, because of the demographic explosion and geometric progressive growth in a limited space, like elsewhere, everything is running berserk. The infrastructures break down, the forests are glowing, are burning, creating a premonition of fiery things to come. The green slopes, the Andes, are becoming a naked mountain range; in the city, yearning for the trolley-bus to come, the traffic is becoming a real nightmare, the heavy laden polluted, anti-tourist air causes asthma and other lung diseases, the soaring condors disappeared, progressively, even majestic Pico Bolivar is losing its innocent age-old snow cap.
The Bolivarian Revolution has done many things, yet, still so much to do, so little done!
Yes, globally even the air groans, moans, is being suffocated by the smog, the fog of the scorched jungle log. The weather is being exploited, violated as a United States weapon of mass destruction. Neither the weather nor the human being is fine anymore. There was no natural climate in the very USA over the last thirty years. The rain ... gone with the wind ... and, in the Iraqi desert air no fragrant rose blushes unseen anymore. In fact, roses have no fragrance anymore, they have become highly poisonous, because of the toxic chemicals used to cultivate them in green houses.
HAARP, Tsunamis, Vargas, everywhere.
Power, power reigns, rules the waves, the electro-magnetic waves, scalar waves. Rocks melt, faith no more moves mountains; Big Brother surely does. Along with the desert rats, Mohammed, tortured, violated, terrorized, humiliated, in the name of "liberty", now is forced to hide in the dark sewerage systems, in the quagmires of powerful oil mongrels, of megalomaniac war mongers. In the USA, the Patriot Acts and the concentration camps are awaiting the foreigners, tracked down by chips, the own domestic rebelling poor and working classes.
Many flora and fauna, many bushes and birds are gone, so are the Bushmen, a huge, wild bush fire currently scorches, scourges the agonizing face of the earth. Those who could stop it, have no class interest in doing so. Those who cannot stop it, use their very bodies and souls as human bombs to try to blow the world system to blazes.
And all this is called Progress, Development, Globalization, Civilization, Western and Christianity!
It really deserves the biblical royal treatment that Jesus Christ has suggested for those who slaughter little children. Why do the true, real Christians not fulfill the "socialist" and "revolutionary" wish of their Savior and Redeemer? Why, with the blessing of the United Nations and of the Christian God, Santisimo Pope John Paul II was prepared to approve the coming massacre of innocent Iraqi women and children? Is this divine "infallibility"? Are these "camel driver" babies not "Children of God", members of the human species? Or does Apartheid also reign in Heaven?
In carrying out the sacred, divine death penalties of Jesus Christ, our only problem would be, that there will not be enough mill-stones to hang around the necks of child-murderers like Bush, Rice and Rumsfeld, and their other fascist consorts, all along history, and that the Atlantic Ocean would not be deep enough, because of the millions of African slaves, piled up at its bottom, the innocent victims of the epoch of the brutal Transatlantic Slave Trade. As Walter Rodney explained, the exploited Africans constructed the world market, metropolitan "development", wealth and power!
Holding hands, the dead, these African victims of discovery, militarization and christianization would go around the earth several times. Who cared, who cares about them? What happened to their sighs, their un-Christian, pagan prayers, their reparation, that would go into hundreds of trillions of US $? In fact, it would be impossible to estimate the real historic human misery and damage.
In this specific global context, what has European Christian religion got to do with them, with the peoples of Africa, with Latin America, with Venezuela, with the "Theology of Liberation", with the Bolivarian Revolution? What was and still is the social function of imported European colonial religion? Why does it only work in community, as socialized, not individualized, prozac?
The myth of "my
religion", of "my personal god"
is already part of the ideological strychnine produced and reproduced
in the minds of millions. There do not exist any personal gods or
religions on the globe. What is the real Power of Religion? It has no
power, it is simply a superstructural instrument to produce social
class power, state power, ruling class state power. If the ruling
classes should not need religion tomorrow, they will simply throw it
into the industrial dustbin, where all things that do not serve
capitalist interests always land. It will linger on for a while, but
will eventually vanish into nothingness.

This very issue Fidel also discussed with Walter Martinez in the 'Dossier' interview, and he had no problem with Nothing after death. Like the Marxist philosopher, Ernst Bloch, after knowing a little about Everything, we are keen also to know what Nothing is all about.
Concerning Naked Brutal Power, the coming North American Fascist Power, Orwell made a precise prediction of what is happening currently in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine, and of what is threatening Iran and Venezuela:
"The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness; only power, pure power. "
Also, Orwell underlined that he was not speaking about Stalin or Hitler, but about the coming of a Bush clique type:
"The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. ... Power is not a means, it is an end. ... The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power."
(George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-four, The New American Library of World Literature, New York, 1961, p. 217)
Even knowledge is being converted into chips, into nanobots, into naked materialized power, into Zombie robots, into intellectual private property, into weapons of mass destruction. As Orwell explained, gnosis, episteme, paedagogics, information, news, all will fall under the heavy blows of the fraternal, patriotic "legal" ax of terrorists like Bush, Condoleezza Rice and her "rummy" Feldmarschall, the ineffable Rumsfeld.
Info-war, psycho-war, cognitive dissonance, psychotic disassociation now shake the very foundation of contemporary "civilized" Pallas Athena. "Education", Missionary Work, Religion, always have belonged to the major, most effective instruments of Mind and Thought Control across the ages. From Plato to Hitler, from Stalin to Bush, we can follow the bloody intellectual trails of the current, global, imperialist Mental Holocaust, that across the millennia has inculcated globally a slave mentality, master and slave relations, inhuman alienation.
Concerning censorship, and giving concepts like "terrorism" or "democracy" new fascist "doublethink" connotations, about Winston Smith's Newspeak articles in the Capitalist (New York) "Times", not in the Communist "Pravda" or in the Nazi "Volkszeitung," Orwell's Big Brother comments:
"You take a scholarly interest in Newspeak I believe? ... In your article I noticed you had used two words which have became obsolete. ... Some of the new developments are ingenious. The reduction in the number of verbs - that is the point that will appeal to you."
And, in global fascism, what is the ideological objective of Mind and Thought Control?
"Don't you see, that the whole aim of newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end, we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words, in which to express it." (p.46)
On July 2, 2005, as Al Jazeera informs us, with reference to the Internet, in true Orwellian style, the current Bush clique has in mind to control the world news and to eliminate all unwanted information, independent ideas and thoughts on a global scale:
"A decision by the US to retain oversight of the computers that control internet traffic has drawn harsh criticism about the lack of independence it could mean for the free-flowing, anything-goes communication network. ... Critics contend that in a worst-case scenario, countries refusing to accept US control could establish their own separate Domain Name System, thereby fracturing the internet, with addresses in some regions becoming unreachable in others."
In fact, this burning censorship issue is getting very urgent:
Let us continue to make revolutionary hay, while the emancipatory sun still shines!
Franz
J. T. Lee
franzjutta@cantv.net
|
Franz John Tennyson Lee, Ph. D (University of Frankfurt), Author, Professor Titular & Chairholder of Philosophy and Political Science, University of The Andes, Merida (Venezuela) -- http://www.franzjutta.com ; http://www.franz-lee.org ; http://www.geocities.com/juttafranz/publications00001.html |
More VHeadline.com commentaries by Franz J.T. Lee

http://english.aljazeera.net/
A decision by the
John
Strand, a Copenhagen-based technology consultant said on Friday: "This
seems like an extension of American security in the aftermath of 9/11."
"People will ask: 'Do the Americans
want to control the internet?'"
The
United States announced the move on Thursday, publishing a
four-paragraph statement online, saying it would retain - indefinitely
- oversight of the computers that control ttraffic on the internet,
instead of gradually releasing control to an international body, as
some countries have favoured.
That ran counter to previous
He
said the declaration was a response to growing security threats and
increased reliance on the internet globally for communications and
commerce.
The US controls the
administration "It becomes
politics at a high level. It can only be worked out between the
different countries. I don't see any technology in this"
That has done little to allay fears that
the
Confrontational US move
Patrik
Linden, a spokesman for the Swedish Internet infrastructure foundation,
which runs and develops the Swedish top level domain .se, said the US
announcement was "rather confrontational" towards those who would like
to see an international body take control of the internet root servers.
"This kind of statement doesn't exactly favour that discussion,"
"This is perhaps what a lot of people have thought that [the
The

of 13 root server computers
Instead, it controls the administration of 13 computers - known as root
servers.
The root servers tell web browsers such as Firefox or Internet Explorer
and email programmes how to direct internet traffic.
Though
located in private hands around the world, they contain
government-approved lists of the 260 or so internet suffixes, such as
.com, .net and country designators such as .fr for
Patrik
Faltstrom, one of Sweden's foremost experts on IP technology and a
liaison for both the Internet Engineering Task Force and Internet
Architecture Board, said the US announcement was negative for a lot of
countries.
"It's not going to work in the long run to have the
Political motivation
While the
"It
becomes politics at a high level," he said. "It can only be worked out
between the different countries. I don't see any technology in this."
In
"When
the internet is being increasingly utilised for private use, by
businesses and so forth, there is a societal debate about whether it's
befitting to have one country maintaining checks on that. It's likely
to fuel that debate," said Masahiko Fujimoto of the Ministry of
Internal Affairs and Communications' data communications division.
In
1998, the Commerce Department selected a private organisation with
international board members, the Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers, to decide what goes on those lists.
Patrik Faltstrom,
Swedish liaison officer, The Internet Engineering Task Force and
Internet Architecture Board
But
Thursday's declaration means the department will keep control over that
process rather than ceding it to ICAAN as originally intended.
Fracturing the internet
The
Critics contend that in a worst-case scenario, countries refusing to
accept
"AOL tried to connect an internet on the internet and it didn't work.
There can't be any walled gardens."
A
United Nations panel is to release a report this month on internet
governance, addressing such issues as oversight of the root servers,
before November's UN World Summit on the Information Society in
Some countries have pressed to move oversight to an international body,
such as the UN International Telecommunication Union.
AP
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F74386DB-3B23-49E4-B70A-04A02D513538.htm

|
Fidel y Chávez: Feliz reencuentro
Por: Granma
Publicado el Sábado, 02/07/05 02:51am |
|
||||||||||||||

WPA backtracks on Rodney assassination
![]() ASSASSINATED OR KILLED? Dr Walter Rodney |
|
The
party, which has long maintained that its charismatic and
world-renowned co-leader was assassinated in an elaborate plot by the
then governing People’s National Congress (PNC), yesterday got backing
from that party in seeking to replace the word “assassinated” in the
motion with “killed”.
Dr
Rodney, then 38, was a fierce critic of the late President Forbes
Burnham and his government and he was blasted to death on the night of
June 13, 1980, when a remote-controlled bomb disguised as a
walkie-talkie, exploded in his lap.
He
was sitting in a car with his younger brother Donald who, although
injured, survived the blast to tell the world that the walkie-talkie
was given to his brother by a now dead former Guyana Defence Force
(GDF) Sergeant, Gregory Smith.
Smith
slipped out of the country after Rodney’s assassination and surfaced in
French Guiana where he later died.
Rodney’s
death was widely condemned here and abroad as an assassination and his
party’s backtracking on this and supporting the PNC (now the PNC Reform
PNCR) in Parliament yesterday shocked observers in Guyana and the
Caribbean.
“This
is a shocking development and will not go down well with those who
respected Rodney and have no doubt about the manner of his death”, an
eminent regional commentator said last night.
The
National Assembly approved the amended motion moved by the WPA/Guyana
Action Party (WPA/GAP) calling for an inquiry into Rodney’s death.
The
WPA/GAP sought to have the words “assassinated” and “assassination” in
the original motion proposed by the government replaced by the words
“killed” and “death”.
However,
there was division in the House when the vote was taken on the amended
motion, as 17 members from the opposition voted in favour, while 21
members from the government benches abstained.
A
government spokesman said the government side abstained from voting on
the motion because it did not want to support a “watered-down version”
of it.
The
original motion introduced by Minister of Home Affairs and acting
Minister of Culture, Youth and Sport, Ms Gail Teixeira said Rodney was
assassinated and this sparked controversy between the government and
opposition benches who otherwise supported the intention of the motion.
The
motion Teixeira moved calling for an enquiry into the death of Rodney,
read: “Whereas on the 13th June, 1980 Dr Walter Rodney, a distinguished
Guyanese scholar, was assassinated by an explosion which occurred in
his car at John and Hadfield Streets, Georgetown;
And
whereas Dr Rodney was at the time of his death, an eminent political
leader engaged in a struggle against authoritarian rule for democracy
and social justice;
And
whereas there have been calls for a full investigation into the
assassination of Dr Walter Rodney, which have received broad support,
Be
it resolved: That this National Assembly, in paying tribute to the
memory of this illustrious son of Guyana and on the occasion of the
25th anniversary of his untimely and tragic death, support an inquiry
being conducted into the circumstance surrounding the death of Dr
Rodney.”
The
amended motion proposed by Mrs Sheila Holder of WPA/GAP and supported
by the PNCR, read:
“Whereas
on the 13th June 1980 Dr Walter Rodney, a distinguished Guyanese
scholar and champion of the multi-racial working people, was killed by
an explosion which occurred in his car at John and Hadfield Streets,
Georgetown;
And
whereas there been calls for a full and impartial investigation into
the death of Dr Walter Rodney, which have received local, regional and
international support,
Be
it resolved: That this National Assembly, in paying tribute to the
memory of this illustrious son of Guyana and on the occasion of the
25th anniversary of his untimely and tragic death, support an
international enquiry being conducted without delay into the
circumstance surrounding the death of Dr Walter Rodney.”
The
PNCR’s Winston Murray argued that the use of the word “assassinated”
would prejudice an enquiry because the motion is already pronouncing on
the outcome of its finding.
Mrs
Holder supported this position as did Mr Jerome Khan, Mr James
McAllister, Mr Vincent Alexander and Dr Deryck Bernard, all of the PNCR.
However,
Ms Teixeira, refuting their arguments, stressed that ever since his
death, publications throughout the Caribbean and beyond called it an
assassination.
Publications
by the WPA for the recent observances for the 25th anniversary of
Rodney’s death also maintained it was an assassination.
An
inquest held under the previous government headed by the late President
Desmond Hoyte found that Rodney died by “misadventure” but this did not
find general acceptance.
Teixeira,
however, said the acceptance of the need for an enquiry is historic as
it is the first time the National Assembly has “attempted to deal with
a piece of our history,” and therefore sight must not be lost of the
enquiry.
She
also described the move as one that maybe is an attempt at a “version
of truth and reconciliation commission” to that of South Africa which
was conducted after the end of the racist apartheid system to aid the
healing process there.
She
told the House too that Rodney’s widow, Dr Patricia Rodney, in a letter
to President Bharrat Jagdeo requesting an inquiry to bring closure to
the issue, said her husband’s death was an assassination.
Rejecting
claims that the present government when in opposition was vociferous in
its calls for an inquiry but on assumption to office did not move
towards an enquiry, Teixeira explained that the main witness and
suspect, Gregory Smith, could not have been extradited to Guyana
because the laws of France of which French Guiana is a protectorate, do
not allow for extradition to countries which have the death penalty in
its laws.
She
added that negotiations with the French government lasted from 1993 to
1995, with the Guyana Government articulating that despite the death
penalty there is also a provision for a prerogative for mercy by the
President, but this was not accepted by the French government.
The
minister also chided the opposition which accused the government of
politicising the issue, and rhetorically asked whether Rodney had died
from an illness or in a road accident or some similar occurrence.
“It
is a political issue,” she stressed, adding that history can be
unpalatable.
She
was supported by Foreign Trade and International Cooperation Minister,
Mr Clement Rohee, and Labour, Human Services and Social Security
Minister, Dr Dale Bisnauth and General Secretary of the People’s
Progressive Party, Mr Donald Ramotar.
Despite
the differences on the motion, members on both sides of the House spoke
glowingly of Rodney, acknowledging his contributions to academia and
political struggles both at home and internationally. (CHAMANLALL
NAIPAUL)
Chavez launches Caribbean oil alliance
By Magdalena
Morales
PUERTO
LA CRUZ, Venezuela, (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
yesterday launched a Caribbean energy alliance that offered cheaper
direct oil supplies to neighbours including ally Cuba in a challenge to
U.S. influence in the region.
He
presented his Petrocaribe initiative to leaders from 15 Caribbean
states, including (Prime Minister Samuel Hinds from Guyana) and Cuban
President Fidel Castro, and condemned "imperialist" exploitation of
Venezuela's oil by the United States.
Venezuela
is the world's fifth largest oil exporter and a leading oil supplier to
the United States, but nationalist Chavez wants to develop diversified
energy ties with Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean.
"Venezuela
wants to share its energy potential with South America and the
Caribbean, and not be kidnapped by the North (the United States),"
Chavez told the meeting.
In
his Petrocaribe initiative, he proposed making Venezuela the centre of
an oil distribution and refining network serving the Caribbean,
especially poorer oil-importing states.
Chavez
said the initiative would eliminate intermediary private oil traders
and offer easier payment facilities.
Venezuela
is already involved in energy agreements to supply small Caribbean and
Central American states with oil and fuel under preferential terms.
Chavez
said Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA had created an affiliate, PDV
Caribe, to coordinate oil shipping, storage and refining in regional
hubs like Cuba, Jamaica and the Dominican Republic. Venezuela was ready
to invest in their refining facilities.
Caribbean
leaders said the Petrocaribe initiative would provide relief to their
oil-importing economies squeezed by high world oil prices.
"I
think it's a very noble decision," said Grenada's Prime Minister Keith
Mitchell.
The
Petrocaribe plan is part of Chavez's effort to bolster his influence in
the Caribbean and Latin America and promote regional economic unity to
counter what he calls "imperialist" U.S. free-trade policies.
"It's
a relatively low-cost geo-political move. ... It gets Venezuela more
votes in the Organisation of American States and consolidates Chavez
politically," said Michael Shifter of Inter-American Dialogue, a
Washington-based think tank
The
Petrocaribe alliance would be steered by a committee of ministers from
member states and Chavez also announced the creation of a fund to
finance its regional operations.
Venezuela
would contribute an initial $50 million.
Chavez
said Venezuela would continue to ship 1.5 million barrels per day (bpd)
of crude and oil products to the United States.
Venezuela
provides 15 per cent of U.S. oil imports, but Chavez said unfair
"imperialist contracts" have robbed the country for years.
"Mr.
Bush's government, which attacks us so often, is subsidised by us,"
Chavez said.
U.S.
officials often condemn the Venezuelan leader for his close alliance
with Castro and portray the two as like-minded troublemakers bent on
stirring up left-wing revolution and anti-U.S. sentiment in Latin
America.
Chavez
has already used his aggressive oil diplomacy to forge energy accords
with other Latin American countries.

|
The WPA has expressed concern about a state-owned Guyana Chronicle report that the party has backtracked on the question of the assassination of Dr Walter Rodney because of the wording of a motion put before the National Assembly on Wednesday calling for an inquiry into his death. At a press conference at Rodney House at Industry, Greater Georgetown yesterday, WPA activist, Dr Rupert Roopnaraine said the Rodney family and the WPA were in no doubt that Walter Rodney was assassinated on June 13, 1980 although there were many people who believed that he died as a result of "misadventure" as was pronounced by Magistrate Pratt at an inquest. On the matter of the use of the word "assassination" on which "the government seems to be expecting to make the most political mileage against the WPA," Roopnaraine said that the WPA and the family had been convinced for 25 years that Dr Rodney had been assassinated, and had broadcast that year after year to the local, regional and international community. "Any suggestion that we have retreated from this position," he continued, "is an insult to [Rodney's] memory, an insult to the family, and an insult to the party." Roopnaraine said that if the government had intended to honour the wishes of Dr Patricia Rodney, Walter Rodney's widow, who in a letter to President Bharrat Jagdeo had asked that an inquiry be held, they would have consulted with the political parties for a consensus motion. He said there was no consultation even though Dr Patricia Rodney in her letter had asked that Roopnaraine be at "their disposal for future arrangements with regards to the matter." Roopnaraine said when the WPA saw the wording of the motion as it appeared on the order paper for Wednesday's sitting, it felt that it did not stand "a snowball in hell chance of winning the parliamentary consensus that Mrs Rodney required." The WPA prepared the amendments with the involvement of the Rodney family, with Asha Rodney, a human rights lawyer and the youngest of Walter and Patricia Rodney's children contributing to the process. He said the WPA consulted the leadership of the PNCR who gave the assurance that they were prepared to support the amendments, as well as Minister of Home Affairs, Culture, Youth and Sports Gail Teixeira and the Speaker of the National Assembly Ralph Ramkarran, to whom he gave copies of Dr Patricia Rodney's letter. He said they had some difficulties and adopted the parliamentary stance of abstaining in relation to some of the amendments although indicating that they would support the final motion. Roopnaraine said it took them all by surprise that the PPP/C in the end found themselves abstaining on a motion that they "had brought to the house, thereby creating some parliamentary history," and that this may be one for the "Guinness Book of Records." While he understood that they were going to abstain on the "whereas" clauses, he said he could not understand how it was they abstained on the resolve clause which contained the least contentious amendments. The resolve clause amendments called for the inclusion of the name 'Walter' along with that of Rodney, and an international inquiry. This is consistent with the WPA's call over the years. Roopnaraine said the WPA regrets that the government sees it as more important to score political points against their opponents as they view them, rather than honouring the memory of Dr Rodney and creating a commission based on a parliamentary consensus. The motion as amended has gone through in spite of the PPP/C's abstention; it calls for the establishment of an international inquiry without delay. Roopnaraine said that the immediacy reflected the fact thatn "we have waited for 25 years." Moving the motion for the amendment to the substantive motion on Wednesday, WPA MP Sheila Holder had said that it was the desire of the Rodney family to amend the motion so that it would be supported unanimously in the National Assembly. The reason for the amendments, Holder said, was that the word 'assassination' would be "legally improper, and [it would be] prejudicial to pronounce on the causes of Dr Rodney's death while at the same time calling for an inquiry to be called to ascertain the circumstances of his death." The amendment to the second clause, she said, was so that it would not "inhibit debate among members of this House and contribute to the prevention of consensus-making as desired by the Rodney family." |

|
U.S.
Disinformation War Continues Venezuela Rejects CIA, But Opens Doors to FBI & DEA
By: Eva Golinger In mid June 2005, Venezuela’s national intelligence agency, the DISIP, underwent a crisis resulting in an Executive Order that called for a restructuring of the entire intelligence apparatus. The predicament was sparked by the escape of a Colombian drug trafficker, José Maria Corredor, aka "Boyaco", from the agency’s headquarters by paying out more then $3 million to corrupt DISIP functionaries to secure his freedom. Though the Boyaco incident formally set the transformation into motion, changes in the DISIP were long overdue. Venezuela’s pending extradition request of Cuban-Venezuelan terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, currently detained in an El Paso, Texas immigration center, has brought to the surface grave facts about the DISIP’s shady past and clearly evidenced the need for a thorough review of the agency’s operations. Posada Carriles and his self-exiled Cuban cohorts held top positions in the DISIP during the late 1960s and early 1970s, utilizing the Venezuela intelligence division as a platform to wage their war against the Cuban Revolution. Venezuela became home to the largest Cuban exile community outside of Miami, and the base of operations for numerous terrorist activities that resulted in the death and injury of hundreds of innocent civilians in Cuba and abroad. Posada Carriles and others, such as Carlos ("El Mono") Morales Navarette, were also known CIA agents at that time, placed on assignment in Venezuela. Recently declassified documents from Venezuela’s military intelligence agency evidence Posada Carriles later ran a private investigation company in Caracas that was fully outfitted with surveillance equipment and materials provided by the U.S. Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). So even after he and his colleagues left the DISIP, they continued operating within Venezuela in the intelligence community, with full knowledge of the Venezuelan Government, then headed by Carlos Andrés Pérez in his first term. Considering that today declassified documents from the CIA and other US agencies have provided proof of US involvement in the April 2002 coup d’etat against President Chávez, the subsequent oil industry sabotage that again attempted his ouster and last year’s recall referendum on President Chávez’s mandate, in which more than $9 million was injected to ensure an opposition victory, Venezuela must be cautious of CIA meddling and presence within its borders. (see www.venezuelafoia.info). And though Interior Minister Jesse Chacón swore in a new chief of the DISIP on June 20, 2005, Colonel Henry Rangel, and made a pledge to reorient the agency’s responsibility to focus exclusively on intelligence and counterintelligence activities, his claim that Venezuela would not work with the CIA but would work with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), raises concern. Of course the CIA, FBI and DEA are three different agencies, but after the recent restructuring of the U.S. intelligence system, which resulted in the creation of a National Director of National Intelligence (DNI) that would oversee all intelligence agencies in the nation, it is clear that the distinct agencies will have overlapping duties and responsibilities, filling in where others can’t act. And President George W. Bush’s chosen DNI, John Negroponte, is an individual who played a key role in the most heinous low intensity conflicts and interventions in Central America during the eighties. Furthermore, confidential Venezuelan government reports say DEA agents in Venezuela have been involved in acts of sabotage, drug trafficking, infiltrations and violations of law intended to reflect poorly on Venezuela’s international reputation as a fighter of narco-trafficking. The reports evidence what has been proven in other parts of the world, that the Drug Enforcement Agency is used as yet another political tool of the United States government to promote its interests abroad. In the case of Venezuela, evidence demonstrates DEA agents have appropriated illegal drug shipments, bungling Venezuelan government efforts to seize and process drug traffickers, and have sabotaged numerous attempts to catch drug smugglers and traffickers. Instead of fulfilling its official role to aid in the seizure and arrest of drug traffickers, the DEA in Venezuela has played a criminal and interventionist role, evidently with the purpose of preventing the Venezuelan Government from complying with its international obligations. Nonetheless, the U.S. embassy in Venezuela published a report in 2003;(International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2003) that generally praised Venezuela's cooperation with U.S. drug enforcement efforts. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Venezuela operates from inside the U.S. Embassy in Caracas. As typical in most U.S. Embassies around the world, the Legal Representative of the Embassy is the FBI field officer. It is difficult to fathom that this individual, working under the auspices of the U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela, will not be promoting a pro-US agenda. As evidenced in recently declassified documents from the FBI regarding the Luis Posada Carriles case, it was the FBI officer in Venezuela that maintained contact with Posada Carriles during his years in Venezuela apparently as the liaison between the Cuban terrorist and the U.S. intelligence community. Considering the notorious pasts of both the FBI and DEA in Venezuela, and their new relationship with the CIA and DNI, the newly structured Venezuelan intelligence agency would be wise to take great cautions when opening its doors to intelligence collaborations with the United States Government. Pentagon Disinformation War On Venezuela And Increased Military Presence In Latin America In a surprising act in the middle of the night on May 26, 2005, the Paraguayan Government authorized the entry of U.S. soldiers and military chiefs for an eighteen-month period, through December 2006. The midnight resolution also approved a regulation providing immunity to US soldiers for any violations of national or international laws committed on Paraguayan soil. Known as an Article 98 agreement, referring to Article 98 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, the resolution has been used by the Bush Administration to chip away at the credibility and jurisdiction of the ICC. The initial request of the U.S. government included the entry of thirteen (13) military contingents in Paraguay, comprised of 499 soldiers, equipment, weapons and ammunition. The U.S. military presence will be used to build a base of operations in the Southern Cone, an area the Bush Administration has repeatedly referred to as ripe for terrorists because of its porous tri-nation border. Currently, the U.S. military has small operational bases in Aruba/Curaçao, Manta, Ecuador and El Salvador, termed Forward Operating Locations (FOLs), and larger bases in Honduras, Guantánamo, Cuba and throughout Colombia. Since the coup d’etat against President Jean Bertrand Aristide in early 2004, the U.S. has increased its military presence on that Caribbean island, possibly with the long-term objective of building a permanent base. And the U.S. military still maintains a minor presence in Puerto Rico and Panamá, despite base closures during the past few years. The growth of U.S. presence in the region falls in line with the new changes being adapted by SOUTHCOM, one of the five U.S. military commands that cover the entire globe. SOUTHCOM is charged with Latin America and the Caribbean and counts on an $800 million budget and 1,400 regular staff members. Recently, SOUTHCOM Commander Brantz Craddock accused Venezuela of generating "destabilization" in the region resulting from the government’s "threats to democracy". Craddock’s statements repeat the numerous declarations made by U.S. Government spokespersons, ranging from President Bush himself, to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Sub-Secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere Roger Noriega and other lower-level players. The statements have been reiterated in U.S. media, without providing solid evidence to back up such dangerous accusations, leading to concerns of a U.S. media-government propaganda campaign against Venezuela. Despite repeated denials from the U.S. Government regarding a campaign against Venezuela, a recent Pentagon restructuring authorized the deployment of "counterpropaganda teams" to Latin America, set to neutralize points of "potential terrorist activity and regional destabilization," amongst them, Venezuela and Bolivia. According to a report from the June 13, 2005 edition of Time Magazine, referred to in La Nación Exterior (June 19, 2005, "EEUU lanza una Guerra de propaganda en la region"), during the last six months, the Pentagon has deployed teams of 2 to 4 military specialists in psychological operations to develop publicity campaigns that promote Washington’s interests in the Middle East, Latin America and other strategic parts of the world. The new unit, called the Joint Psyops Support Element (JPSE), nicknamed "gypsy" is based at the U.S. Special Operations Command headquarters in Tampa, FL. Considered "psychological warriors", the Pentagon has been sending these specialists to its overseas commands, armed with "plans for pro-U.S. advertising campaigns to counter propaganda from enemies." According to the Time Magazine article, "JPSE director Jim Treadwell told Time he eventually wants to send those units into Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America, where they would produce commercial-quality television ads, radio spots, websites and printed material to burnish the U.S.’s image in those regions." The JPSE team has a budget of US$77.5 million for the next seven years, in addition to extra funds available to counterattack accusations from "terrorist groups" in any nation. According to La Nacion, a SOUTHCOM spokesperson confirmed that the JPSE team will operate in Latin America, though specifics could not be provided. The JPSE team plans to contract four public relations agencies in the US during the next few weeks for US$250,000 each, in order to design the basic structures of the propaganda campaigns. Director Treadwell, who headed the 4th Psychological Operations Group during the Irak invasion, confirmed that the idea is to "be as creative as possible." Such creativity could include the use of "black propaganda", information purporting to originate from the "enemy" to confuse and discredit society. According to Treadwell, "usually, we don’t use black propaganda. And if we did, I couldn’t tell you." Considering that SOUTHCOM"s new "theater of operations" includes as its first security objective, "improving the ability of partner nation security forces to protect critical infrastructure of the energy industry in the region", Venezuela, as the largest oil exporter in SOUTHCOM’s territory must be an area of prime focus. The sixth objective of the new SOUTHCOM theater of operations also appears directed at Venezuela: "Prevent rogue states from supporting terrorist organizations." Since Latin America is not home to any "rogue states", and the SOUTHCOM objectives leave such countries unnamed, one can only be left to assume that Cuba and Venezuela are the points of reference. The Bush Administration has accused Venezuela on numerous occasions of harboring groups considered terrorist by the U.S., such as the FARC and ELN from Colombia, despite never presenting any solid evidence. And recently, this author received a declassified secret document from the State Department alleging that groups such as Hezbollah and Asbat Al-Ansar receive operational and financial support in Venezuela and further claiming that the Venezuelan social organizations, Coordinadora Simon Bolivar, M-28 and the Jirajaras are groups engaged in terrorist activities. However, no concrete evidence has been provided to back these dangerous allegations. Also, Venezuela’s commercial relationship with Cuba, a nation classified by the U.S. Government as a "terrorist refuge", clearly provides more reasons for SOUTHCOM to justify its growing intervention in the region. Though a direct U.S. military action in Venezuela still seems far off, the expanding military presence in the region, particularly surrounding Venezuela, the newly launched PSYOPS teams intended to promote U.S. interests and policies for propaganda campaigns, and the ever-increasing energy needs of the U.S. all seem to imply an imminent operation against Venezuela is in the works. Eva Golinger is a Venezuelan-American attorney specializing in international human right |